Monday–Friday, 9:00–18:00 (EET)office@bulsmetka.bg
WhatsAppBG / EN

Article

Nominee director and shareholder services in Bulgaria: how they work

A nominee changes what appears on the public register. It does not change what you owe the Bulgarian state under anti-money-laundering law. The two get confused often enough that it's worth being precise about which is which.

Updated · Reviewed by Hristo Ivanov, chief accountant

In short

  • A nominee is the person registered as manager or shareholder in the public Commercial Register; actual control is normally set out in a private agreement between the nominee and the real owner.
  • Bulgaria still requires every company to declare its ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) to the Commercial Register, regardless of any nominee arrangement.
  • A nominee changes what's visible on the public record — it does not let you avoid disclosing beneficial ownership to the state.
  • If your actual goal is anonymity from AML authorities rather than privacy from public search, no compliant EU structure — Bulgarian or otherwise — will get you there.

What "nominee" means in Bulgaria, specifically

When a Bulgarian company is registered, the manager and the shareholders are entered by name in the Commercial Register — a public, searchable record. A nominee arrangement means a different person's name is entered there than the person who actually makes the decisions and receives the economic benefit. The relationship between the two is normally set out in a private civil agreement — a power of attorney combined with an indemnification or declaration of trust arrangement — rather than a formal instrument filed anywhere public.

This matters because Bulgarian law doesn't have the common-law concept of a trust in the way some offshore jurisdictions do. The nominee relationship rests on ordinary contract law between the two private parties. Toward the Commercial Register, the bank, tax authorities, or anyone else the company deals with, the nominee is the manager or shareholder — the private agreement doesn't bind or inform third parties, it only governs the two people who signed it.

What it hides — and what it does not (the UBO question)

Under Bulgaria's Measures Against Money Laundering Act, which implements the EU's anti-money-laundering directives, every Bulgarian legal entity must identify and declare its ultimate beneficial owner — the natural person who directly or indirectly holds at least 25% of the capital or voting rights, or who otherwise exercises actual control — within one month of incorporation, with any change updated within seven days. This declaration goes to the Commercial Register, run by the Registry Agency, separately from the ordinary shareholder listing.

A nominee director or shareholder does not remove this obligation. If you are the person actually controlling the company, you are its UBO under the law — regardless of whose name sits in the shareholder field — and you (or the company, through its manager) must declare that. Using a nominee to avoid the UBO filing altogether isn't a grey area; it's the exact thing the filing requirement exists to catch, and it carries real penalties.

Legitimate reasons founders use nominees

  • Keeping a name out of casual public search — journalists, competitors, or acquaintances running a Commercial Register lookup won't see it, even though regulators and banks still can.
  • Personal safety or sensitivity — for some founders, having their name attached to a specific business is a real personal-security concern, not just a preference.
  • Holding structures — where the registered shareholder is a parent company rather than an individual nominee, which is a different and more common arrangement entirely.

What it does not achieve

It's worth being blunt here, because overselling this is both wrong and irresponsible. A nominee arrangement does not evade the UBO/AML disclosure obligation described above. It does not make bank account opening easier — a bank's own KYC process looks past whoever is registered to the actual beneficial owner regardless, so a nominee director doesn't shortcut the due diligence described in opening a corporate account as a non-resident. And it does not eliminate exposure for the nominee themselves, who remains formally and legally the manager on record for whatever the company does, whatever the private indemnity agreement says between the two of you.

When your actual need points somewhere other than Bulgaria

If what you want is privacy from casual public lookup, a nominee arrangement within a Bulgarian company can genuinely do that. If what you actually want is to avoid beneficial-ownership disclosure to authorities altogether, that isn't something Bulgaria — or any compliant EU jurisdiction, given the shared EU AML framework — can offer, and it's not something Bulsmetka would set up. It's worth being honest about which of the two you actually need before choosing a structure, rather than assuming a nominee solves a problem it doesn't. If you're unsure which applies to your situation, talk to us before registering anything.

Frequently asked questions

Is a nominee director legal in Bulgaria?

+

Using someone as the formally registered manager under a private agreement isn't itself illegal. But Bulgarian law doesn't give that private agreement any effect toward third parties or the state — the nominee is legally the manager, full stop, and the beneficial owner still has to be declared separately.

Does a nominee shareholder hide who owns the company from the Bulgarian state?

+

No. Every Bulgarian company must declare its ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) — the natural person who actually controls it — to the Commercial Register within one month of incorporation, regardless of whether a nominee's name appears as the registered shareholder.

Is Bulgaria's beneficial owner register public?

+

It's accessible to state authorities and to banks and other entities carrying out AML checks. General public access to UBO data across the EU has narrowed following EU court rulings in recent years — verify the current access rules for your specific situation rather than assuming either full secrecy or full publicity.

What happens if a company doesn't file its UBO declaration?

+

Fines for a missing or late declaration were raised in 2024 to up to BGN 5,000 (roughly €2,550 at the fixed euro conversion rate) under the Measures Against Money Laundering Act. The filing is mandatory regardless of whether a nominee is used.

Sources

Measures Against Money Laundering Act; Registry Agency, registryagency.bg; EU 4th and 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directives, europa.eu. Verified 4 September 2026.

Important

Bulsmetka is a private accounting firm, not a law firm. This is general information, not a substitute for individual legal advice on a specific ownership structure.

Related pages

Buying property as a foreigner Corporate bank account as a non-resident Company formation